tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4757518754452371526.post5670112354385892683..comments2023-07-03T03:22:43.814-07:00Comments on GREEN BIM NETWORK: GBXML 2010Jon Gardzelewskihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02727630077109839339noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4757518754452371526.post-5159185470610989492009-05-11T07:04:00.000-07:002009-05-11T07:04:00.000-07:00Jon,
You are indeed correct, In-Place Familes are ...Jon,<br />You are indeed correct, In-Place Familes are not supported in the gbXML Analytical Model. I didn't realize that was an in-place Family from the image.<br /><br />I spoke with our developer behind our gbXML functionality, and he informed me that the primary limitation is that we don't know what surfaces to generate to represent the In-Place Family. With System Familes we know to KyleBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17147511783897630792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4757518754452371526.post-16767893353896903812009-05-09T13:33:00.000-07:002009-05-09T13:33:00.000-07:00I'm using an in-place family. I've tried it as a ...I'm using an in-place family. I've tried it as a floor and as a roof. When I define it as a roof I have the option to make it room bounding, but it's still not recognized as an analytical surface. A shape this basic could easily be made with a system family "floor" or "roof" and Revit would pick up the analytical surface. But when we get into more complicated shapes like any type of brie Jon Gardzelewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02727630077109839339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4757518754452371526.post-45167199277802667712009-05-07T12:22:00.000-07:002009-05-07T12:22:00.000-07:00Jon,
With that Shading Surface thaat didn't transl...Jon,<br />With that Shading Surface thaat didn't translate to gbXML, what Category of Element was it? Was it set to be Room Bounding?<br /><br />KyleKyleBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17147511783897630792noreply@blogger.com